Industrialists were more likely to succeed
in Great Britain. In the factories in Great Britain, the workers were paid less
money, so the owners made more money. The owners did not have to give the workers
the majority of their wages. The workers were paid less money because there was
more labor available in Great Britain, most of which were previous farmers and
their families. If someone quit their job at the factory, they could easily be
replaced by another worker. In these factories, the workers were less likely to
protest against the owners because they would be replaced right away. The factory
owners did not have to worry about their workers’ feelings. In “Observations of the Loss on the Woollen Spinning
1794,” the author writes, “In the eyes of the overseer she was but a brute, a
slave, to be beaten, pinched and pushed about.” It is understood that the
owners did not have to work hard in order to make sure that their workers were
satisfied. The owners simply had to make sure that the workers were doing their
jobs correctly, punish them if they were not, and pay them a small amount.
Workers had a more positive
experience in the United States. For farmers, there was more land available. There
were more land and job options for these workers if their small businesses were
replaced by large companies. In “Early Factory Labor in New England 1883,” the
author wrote, “Those of the millgirls who had homes generally worked from
eight to ten months in the year; the rest of the time was spent with parents or
friends. A few taught school during the summer months. Their life in the
factory was made pleasant to them. In those days there was no need of
advocating the doctrine of the proper relation between employer and employed.
Help was too valuable to be ill-treated....” The mills in the United States
that textile workers worked in were cleaner and more sanitary than the mills in
Great Britain. There were more breaks and fewer hours for workers in the United
States than in Great Britain. In the United States, less labor was available,
which meant that the factories were in need of their workers. Workers were able
to protest for fair treatment, since the owners could not replace them.

No comments:
Post a Comment