Thursday, February 13, 2014

EdCafe: A Great Way to Learn

I enjoyed the EdCafe model more than a Socrative Seminar.  I felt more comfortable saying my thoughts and opinions, since there was less pressure with the small groups. In a large group, there are many awkward silences because people do not know when exactly to talk, while in small groups, there are more opportunities for students to express their ideas. Some students do not feel comfortable talking in front of a large group. I also liked how we could pick which topic to go to. This way, I was more encouraged to pay close attention and take notes. Since students were able to pick which topic to go to, based on what interests them, people took more out of the activity, instead of sitting there bored and daydreaming. The EdCafe felt productive and comfortable for me.
                When presenting, I had many questions prepared so that I did not run out of things to talk about. There were no awkward silences where I had to improve on what to say. Even if one question did not spark a long conversation, there were plenty of other questions to move on to. The attendees seemed to have many ideas to say about my topic and questions. I used the Smart Board notebook so that students had a visual. I wrote down what the attendees said, in order to allow the attendees to know exactly what to take notes on. Next time I would change my questions in order to make them more different from each other. At times, it felt as though people were repeating the same ideas because my questions were too similar to each other. For example, one of my questions was, “In such poor conditions, what motivations did slaves have to keep on living through a life of bondage?” Another question was, “What kept slaves from committing suicide?” To answer both of these questions, people gave the ideas of family and the possibility of becoming free. There was not much difference between these two questions, which caused the group to say the same things when talking about each question. When leading, I felt successful in terms of being prepared, although I would like to improve on giving my questions more diversity.

                As an attendee, took notes on what the leaders wrote on the Smart Board. For each station, I happened to be interested in the topics that were both at the Smart Board station. Whenever another student, or myself, added to the conversation or if anything was written on the Smart Board by the leader, I would write it down. I contributed by giving the idea that slaves were physically harassed by their masters and that slaves risked sacrificing their families by escaping during the first station. I contributed my ideas to two out of the three questions that were presented. During my second session of being an attendee, I shared my thoughts for four out of the six questions that were asked. I explained how slaves were whipped and abused by masters, how the slaves had to make the decision of escaping or not and if they wanted to commit suicide or not, that family motivated them to want to survive, and how Harriet Jacobs had to make the decision of leaving her kids. I felt as though I helped the discussions move along when being an attendee.


https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEineAUdWlYztWPi6Rd6OfQ27zKaljxw7KkRx9mjBqehqrG4mh0RhWmuHKyH4ta7hOIBg9Hbcpl9weHCokVFzYjZ0LGtvzq4EK4yPPVU0DESQyR-5GI_6fzPTA3ompslzU-UF4zSXKQd0pUA/s1600/EdCafe+Day.jpg



Tuesday, February 4, 2014

Rethinking Americans in the Antebellum North Against Slavery


Americans in the Antebellum North were not really against slavery on moral grounds because they thought of slaves as property, and not on economic grounds because slavery was essential to the economy. States could not prohibit slavery, but they could put a tax on slaves. The Industrial business was run by slaves. The more cloth produced, the more cotton that was consumed, and more slaves were needed to produce the cotton. The table linked to below shows that in 1834 753,270 yards of cloth was produced each week and the slave population was 2,300,000. In 1858 when 2,394,000 yards of cotton was produced each week, the slave population increased to 3,953,696. Lowell depended on the slave system in order to get raw cotton. Lowell sold the finished product to slave owners so that the owners could dress their slaves. This is shown in the “Lowell Cloth” picture below. Americans in the Antebellum North did not think of slaves as a “whole person.” They treated slaves as property.

 



Table of Cotton Production/Slave Population: Statistics of Lowell Manufacturers, courtesy Center for Lowell History, University of Massachusetts Lowell. http://www.edline.net/files/_wdH5g_/e9aa25b9887eebbc3745a49013852ec4/Unit_4_Activity_5_Doc_2_Cotton_Prod_v_Slave_Pop.pdf