Monday, October 28, 2013

Independence in the Americas


The thirteen British colonies and Latin America had many differences. These included slave population, government goals, and most importantly, the British colonies were better prepared for independence than Latin America.

British North American colonists were better prepared for independence than their Latin American neighbors to the south because of literacy. In Latin America, ninety percent of the population was illiterate. In Literacy in New Spain by Joseph Esherick, Hasan Kayalı, and Eric Van Young, it is stated that, “The literacy rate in New Spain in 1810 could not have been much higher than 10 percent overall, with much of the literate population compressed spatially into the cities, and socially into the upper reaches of the social hierarchy, so that rural literacy must have been considerably lower.” The ten percent of people that were literate in Latin America were in the higher class who lived in the cities. Without literacy, people cannot contribute to their government because they do not understand it. People must be educated about a democratic republic, so that they know the regulations and how the system works. If Latin America became independent people would not know how to govern themselves. However, in the British colonies, more of the population was literate. As time went on, the number of people literate in these colonies increased. It is said in Literacy in the 13 Colonies/Early Republic by Jack Lynch, “Among white New England men, about 60 percent of the population was literate between 1650 and 1670, a figure that rose to 85 percent between 1758 and 1762, and to 90 percent between 1787 and 1795. In cities such as Boston, the rate had come close to 100 percent by century’s end.” Unlike in Latin America, the people who were literate had different jobs. In the colonies, the majority of the population was white. In Population in the US 1790, the pie charts show that the Northeast population was almost completely whites, with few enslaved and free blacks. The Southern population was about 2/3 white and almost 1/3 of the population was enslaved, with a minor percent of the population being free slaves. The reason why the British colonies were more literate than in Latin America was because whites made up most of the population. Whites were the ones who were educated in the British colonies. In the British colonies, people understood how their government functions because most people were literate. If they became independent, they would know exactly how to maintain the government.
http://comparativehistoryamericanrevs.weebly.com/uploads/3/0/0/9/3009385/7022367_orig.jpg
 

http://comparativehistoryamericanrevs.weebly.com/uploads/3/0/0/9/3009385/7022367_orig.jpg
In addition to literacy, British North American colonists were better prepared for independence than their Latin American neighbors to the south because of political experience. In Latin America, the top two classes were located in Spain, not the colonies. Edward L. Ayers, Lewis L. Gould, David M. Oshinsky, and Jean R. Soderlund write in American Passages, “Directly below the monarch was the Council of the Indies, located in Spain and composed of men who knew little about the New World. The council regulated trade, appointed officials, made laws, and determined who should be allowed to emigrate.” These top two levels determined the laws of people living in the colonies from far away. There are many levels, but they were all controlled by people born in Spain. People living in the colonies had no say in their laws. In On Civil Law, it is said, “Monarchs appointed judges to act as agents strictly accountable to the monarch rather than local magnates; required judges to apply the written law rather than general principles to all cases no matter how dissimilar.” Judges in Latin America were only allowed to apply written laws. They were not able to pass laws that fit certain situations. People had to follow their monarchs and had no experience in self-governing in Latin America. The British colonies however, had fewer social classes, with the royal governor (the level underneath the king) living in the colonies. The colonies could self-govern. Edward Eggleston writes in A History of the United States and its People, ““The Charter of Massachusetts Bay of 1629, for example, declared that all who should settle in that colony should “have and enjoy all liberties and Immunities of free and naturall Subjects . . . to all Intents, [Constructions], and Purposes whatsoever, as [if] they and [everyone] of them were borne within the Realme of England.”[25]” Since the British colonies had experience with self-governing, they would be prepared to govern themselves if they were to gain independence.

 
http://comparativehistoryamericanrevs.weebly.com/uploads/3/0/0/9/3009385/7899709_orig.jpg
 
The British colonies had more literate citizens and more political experience than Latin America. These two factors caused British North American colonists to be better prepared for independence than their Latin American neighbors to the south.

No comments:

Post a Comment